Don't ban him until we execute him!

[Crab_Spider]

Summary (a quick, 2-3 sentence summary): Don't ban a griefer until we execute his stupid ass, and then you can do whatever you were trying to do.

Benefits (How this will benefit the server and game as a whole):
We will have so much fun ordering the death of someone by firing squad while they scream in absolute agony. We can finally RP. It'll be so awesome to have a full blown shootout on Sulaco! Have you ever wondered how much fun it is to kill a human player (during hostile human boardings).

Details (Description of how you think this would work, the benefits, etc): per title.
Did he kill the CMO? Well then don't ban him yet. Let shitcurity do their job and then let Security do that job. Or just let Harry Cowper blow a load of buckshot to the guy's face and then ban him!

Implementation (Optional, if you have an idea how to implement it): I don't know. Staff intervention ?

[Heckenshutze]

Execute Brett Kimple

[XenonDragneel]

Execute Bill Carson

[Nightcaper]

EDIT: Realized this was in acid goop, was testing the "see users post" feature Rahl fixed. Should have checked the actual forum section first. Meh, I was had, so I'll keep it up.


-1 for a couple of reasons:

1. This will be a bottleneck in taking care of cases since staff would have to wait for execution to even be arranged before taking action.

2. Putting punishment of a griefer in the players hands... just doesn't sound good to me. The staff handle things good, are quick about it and professional.



I don't get a good gut feeling from this suggestion, so much can go wrong and I don't feel its our place to punish griefers even if it's only IC and the staff takes care of them OOC anyway. As the suggestion is right now I can't support it.

[SovietKitty]

-1

Most of them just go SSD after they're caught anyway.