The Morality Test

[Martzin]

A bit like the Political Compass but instead it's your morality. Post your results!
http://moralmachine.mit.edu/



Here's mine:

[Tristan63]

http://moralmachine.mit.edu/results/-148913569

Im a terrible person

[Dog]

I just went for whatever saved the most life regardless of age, body type, class and/or their criminal history, but I think that saving the lives of women over men is a better idea if either choice is entirely equal. Above all else though I'll choose the choice that saves the most life regardless of all other factors.

In the case of saving one human being versus three animal lives I consider the human life to be more important.

People minding their own business shouldn't have to pay for something another person paid for as the buyer knew the risk of this happening.

I guess this would put me next to the people who wear fedoras, but that's okay.

[Warnipple]

http://moralmachine.mit.edu/results/-1686302943

Gotsta protekts teh wimmen

[Dog]

Can't load up the links. When it loads the results' ID is removed and there's nothing left but a blank page.

[Martzin]

Can't load up the links. When it loads the results' ID is reoved and there's nothing left but a blank page.

Yeah, I've noticed that now. Using screenshots is the only way it seems, but who doesn't use screenshots?

[SPACEpotato1]

[Desolane900]

Instructions unclear. Dick got caught in self driving dilemma.

[Warnipple]

I had the same result. This test doesn't have much variance.

[Biolock]

I think this is a flawed test, tried to post my results, but it didn't work for some reason.

Here are my reasons; you can choose various answers for various reasons. My rules when playing this game were: Humans > Animals; Young People > Old people; Pedestrians > Passengers (This one I was iffy on, but I made this decision non-the less); More people > Less people; Criminals have a slight value subtraction in this game.

I feel like many people would agree (At least mostly) with my grading scale, yet the game sometimes forces you to make decisions that, because of the options available, make it seem as though you value overweight people, or women more; which was simply not the case, in this sense, for me, it was purely a numbers game.

[Martzin]

I think this is a flawed test, tried to post my results, but it didn't work for some reason.

Here are my reasons; you can choose various answers for various reasons. My rules when playing this game were: Humans > Animals; Young People > Old people; Pedestrians > Passengers (This one I was iffy on, but I made this decision non-the less); More people > Less people; Criminals have a slight value subtraction in this game.

I feel like many people would agree (At least mostly) with my grading scale, yet the game sometimes forces you to make decisions that, because of the options available, make it seem as though you value overweight people, or women more; which was simply not the case, in this sense, for me, it was purely a numbers game.

This may actually be the case, I played around with the test and got very different results. This seems to be because the test randomly picks different scenarios which could make things seem totally one-sided depending on your decision.

[Jay Burns]

i feel like a dick http://moralmachine.mit.edu/results/298989710

[NoahKirchner]

http://moralmachine.mit.edu/ ALL DOGS MUST DIE BY SELF DRIVING CAR, REEEEEE

[danmax67]

http://moralmachine.mit.edu/results/-1290329427

do i win?

[Boltersam]

There is only one thing I learned from this.

I find no shame in being a horrible person.