Squad-level chain of command and competency.

Ultimate badasses.
Post Reply
User avatar
Sneakyr
Registered user
Posts: 261
Joined: 02 Jan 2017, 19:37
Byond: Sneakyranger

Squad-level chain of command and competency.

Post by Sneakyr » 31 May 2017, 22:48

As a squad leader, you're likely to be wounded or killed. In these cases, it is best to have a second in command. For most leaders, this is the specialist by rank.
But what if the chain of command is incompetent until you get to the bottom rungs? What if leaving command of your squad with the spec would spell certain doom, but leaving them with the LCPL would likely allow them to remain effective?
What I'm asking is what the community thinks of a squad leader bypassing the chain of command and electing a lower rank to lead higher ranks based on competency rather than the CoC.
Image
I'm Frankie Day, resident SL along with various other roles.

User avatar
Casany
Registered user
Posts: 1555
Joined: 06 Jun 2016, 09:18
Location: US of A
Byond: Casany
Steam: Casany

Re: Squad-level chain of command and competency.

Post by Casany » 31 May 2017, 23:00

Sneakyr wrote:As a squad leader, you're likely to be wounded or killed. In these cases, it is best to have a second in command. For most leaders, this is the specialist by rank.
But what if the chain of command is incompetent until you get to the bottom rungs? What if leaving command of your squad with the spec would spell certain doom, but leaving them with the LCPL would likely allow them to remain effective?
What I'm asking is what the community thinks of a squad leader bypassing the chain of command and electing a lower rank to lead higher ranks based on competency rather than the CoC.
Well, OOC wise it makes sense to give it to competent players but IC wise it really doesn't.

I think it's up to the SL personally
"He killed me with a SADAR and it was bullshit. We should ban him for ERP because of how VIOLENTLY HE FUCKED ME" - Biolock, Saturday 15 October 2016

"Sometimes you need to stop and enjoy the little things in life, for one day you'll look back and realize they were big things"

"To quote Suits A cop follows a car long enough, he's gonna find a busted tail light. And even if he doesn't, he's gonna bust it himself." - Awan on being an MP

User avatar
completelynewguy
Registered user
Posts: 558
Joined: 15 May 2016, 18:17
Location: Washington, USA

Re: Squad-level chain of command and competency.

Post by completelynewguy » 31 May 2017, 23:05

Well, from personal experience, most Specs are just the Heavy Demolitionist or the Sniper (either variant), meaning they're too busy about leading. Plus the fact that xenos can recognize what weapon they're using. From what I've seen, it would be best to make the Smartgunner the field SL due to the fact that the Smartgun has IFF with 300 rounds loaded at the start. Theoretically meaning they can afford to take a potshot while screaming orders on the radio.

Skimmy2
Registered user
Posts: 373
Joined: 19 May 2017, 00:53
Byond: Skimmy2

Re: Squad-level chain of command and competency.

Post by Skimmy2 » 01 Jun 2017, 02:40

Making a SL lead based on role is pretty meta.

You might as well give Command to a PFC, because you cant fire your weapon and lead at the same time.

Likewise telling your Squads Smartgunner that he CANT fire his Smartgun as fast as possible because he is babysitting the radio is pretty horrible for the Squad.
Steve Humason : Squad Leader, Military Police, Squad Marine
Chroma Tuflos : Pilot Officer, Corporate Liaison

User avatar
Nick123q23
Posts: 455
Joined: 07 Jul 2015, 12:44
Location: LV-1201
Byond: Nick123q23

Re: Squad-level chain of command and competency.

Post by Nick123q23 » 01 Jun 2017, 04:11

If your spec is so incompetent that he can't take over for you if you turn into a casualty, then you have bigger problems to worry about than if you can pass it on to the lance corporal
Player of faceless xenomorphs of the species XX121, Miranda 'Mira' Laporte, Daniel Gryphon, Kia and Akl'iiya Quatza-rij
Proudly played as and won a round as an Ancient Empress

User avatar
4thsurviver
Registered user
Posts: 176
Joined: 21 Jan 2017, 15:42
Byond: 4thsurviver

Re: Squad-level chain of command and competency.

Post by 4thsurviver » 01 Jun 2017, 14:26

In terms of rank it goes SL, then Spec, then Engineers or Medics, then Smartgunner, and then whatever Grunts are still alive. As a SO whenever both the SL and the Spec die, getting someone to take over the squad usually becomes a pain as no one wants the job. I'll try to give squad command to a medic if no one volunteers. Sometimes I can't even get the squad to take their SL's helmet even if they've already recovered the body.

The way I see it the Spec is someone that has put their time in the corps and learned all its weapons and equipment it offers and earned their sergeant stripes and should be perfectly capable to take command from a RP perspective. The Smartgunner is just a grunt with a cool gun. They are the new heavy weapons guy.
Bran Jast. Over worked Bridge officer, uncaring MP, injured Marine. Shrug. Now without Robot Arm!

Skimmy2
Registered user
Posts: 373
Joined: 19 May 2017, 00:53
Byond: Skimmy2

Re: Squad-level chain of command and competency.

Post by Skimmy2 » 01 Jun 2017, 19:49

I personally put a Corporal in charge of 1 of my fire teams to encourage leadership, unless if the 4 corporals are dead/cannot decide who becomes the new SL, there really shouldnt be any confusion.
Steve Humason : Squad Leader, Military Police, Squad Marine
Chroma Tuflos : Pilot Officer, Corporate Liaison

User avatar
MrJJJ
Registered user
Posts: 1935
Joined: 12 Jan 2015, 10:51
Location: Spider Lab

Re: Squad-level chain of command and competency.

Post by MrJJJ » 02 Jun 2017, 01:51

>When your SL is a baldie and you get promoted to one while specing

reeeeee

User avatar
Supermichael777
Registered user
Posts: 60
Joined: 26 Sep 2016, 15:24
Byond: Supermichael777

Re: Squad-level chain of command and competency.

Post by Supermichael777 » 04 Jun 2017, 23:14

Sl
Spec
engineer
medic
smartgunner
standard with the most remaining limbs

Post Reply