Battlefield executions and you.

Ultimate badasses.
User avatar
Jagdges
Registered user
Posts: 33
Joined: 12 Oct 2017, 23:04

Re: Battlefield executions and you.

Post by Jagdges » 21 Oct 2017, 14:06

Tidomann wrote:
21 Oct 2017, 13:50
If people expect battlefield executions to be more reasonable, how about expecting marine roleplay to be more reasonable as well? /S
I'd be up for that. I remember not too long ago briefings weren't always a clown car of goofiness. There isn't a game that goes by that someone, even regulars, insults a Sergeant or Corporal from all the way down on the Private line for some reason. Normally they're completely wrong to boot.

I mean IRL said Sergeant or Corporal could haze said Marine until his limbs fell off. Like Gunny Hartmann says, "I'll PT you until FUCKING DIE."
How bout a UPP game once in a while?

User avatar
Winter
Registered user
Posts: 271
Joined: 26 Oct 2016, 03:21
Byond: TheChibi1

Re: Battlefield executions and you.

Post by Winter » 21 Oct 2017, 14:45

Rain doesn't complain about req line whining because she figures that's a part of req life. Or she could just be unusually tolerant aside from unga dunga and threats against her CTs.
Player of Rain Winterson and Winter Silverson.

Not terribly robust, but will give runners bananas.

User avatar
Philby0
Registered user
Posts: 199
Joined: 13 Jul 2017, 23:02
Byond: Philby

Re: Battlefield executions and you.

Post by Philby0 » 21 Oct 2017, 15:35

Tidomann wrote:
21 Oct 2017, 13:50
If people expect battlefield executions to be more reasonable, how about expecting marine roleplay to be more reasonable as well? /S
Yeah marine gameplay is already expected to be more reasonable than it really is. Enforcing both go hand in hand.
Image

User avatar
RobBrown4PM
Registered user
Posts: 395
Joined: 16 May 2016, 11:22

Re: Battlefield executions and you.

Post by RobBrown4PM » 21 Oct 2017, 16:57

I like the idea of having BFE's, but they should be accompanied by the real risk of Central (IC via the admins) coming down on the CDR if the Execution is for a petty reason. Equally, there should be the risk of a mutiny occurring if the execution is a dick and nazi move (This would require a bit more of a liberal leash from the admins concerning mutinies).
Mains: Roberto 'Taco' Moreno
Usual Jobs: SL/Spec/SG/Engie/XO

User avatar
Blade2000Br
Registered user
Posts: 730
Joined: 12 Jun 2017, 14:09
Byond: blade2000br

Re: Battlefield executions and you.

Post by Blade2000Br » 21 Oct 2017, 18:05

RobBrown4PM wrote:
21 Oct 2017, 16:57
I like the idea of having BFE's, but they should be accompanied by the real risk of Central (IC via the admins) coming down on the CDR if the Execution is for a petty reason. Equally, there should be the risk of a mutiny occurring if the execution is a dick and nazi move (This would require a bit more of a liberal leash from the admins concerning mutinies).
considering mutinies in the past, and being the creator of 2 in a week span, I gotta say it is a terrible idea.

pre-rule change two mutinies happened while I was RO because of a marine not getting a single attachment. that ended up a full scale mutiny that messed everything up. there's even an post a few days prior to the rule change that was the reason mutiny rules became so much more strict (funny enough, one of the buildup for it was a actual BE):
viewtopic.php?f=114&t=14006

so no. NO LAX MUTINY RULES.
Jason 'Punk' Crowmel - The guy that don't give a shit about what he does.

Former Rapey Ravager Hater.

User avatar
RobBrown4PM
Registered user
Posts: 395
Joined: 16 May 2016, 11:22

Re: Battlefield executions and you.

Post by RobBrown4PM » 21 Oct 2017, 19:03

BladeBr wrote:
21 Oct 2017, 18:05
considering mutinies in the past, and being the creator of 2 in a week span, I gotta say it is a terrible idea.

pre-rule change two mutinies happened while I was RO because of a marine not getting a single attachment. that ended up a full scale mutiny that messed everything up. there's even an post a few days prior to the rule change that was the reason mutiny rules became so much more strict (funny enough, one of the buildup for it was a actual BE):
viewtopic.php?f=114&t=14006

so no. NO LAX MUTINY RULES.
With my idea, mutinies would still be an admin decision. I would personally rather see the Admins sending an Admiral or other flag officer to deal with the CDR rather than a mutiny occurring.
Mains: Roberto 'Taco' Moreno
Usual Jobs: SL/Spec/SG/Engie/XO

User avatar
4thsurviver
Registered user
Posts: 176
Joined: 21 Jan 2017, 15:42
Byond: 4thsurviver

Re: Battlefield executions and you.

Post by 4thsurviver » 22 Oct 2017, 00:47

I think part of the problem is battlefield executions normally happen as far from the battlefield as it's possible for people to get. If the person is on the ship why not brig them and take them to the execution chamber? That way the matter can have some oversight, remove the risk of someone shooting back, causing a scene, and allow the execution to serve as an example that is broadcast-ed over comms with the reason rather than just gunning someone down and not explaining why.

I think battlefield executions have a place and that place is the battlefield or when the situation demands instant execution because of dangerous conditions or a very strict time constraint. I can't help but feel CO's use battlefield executions so much because they just want to use that sweet metaba.
Bran Jast. Over worked Bridge officer, uncaring MP, injured Marine. Shrug. Now without Robot Arm!

User avatar
HappytoHelp
Registered user
Posts: 20
Joined: 27 Aug 2017, 08:39
Byond: VaValor

Re: Battlefield executions and you.

Post by HappytoHelp » 22 Oct 2017, 01:47

4thsurviver wrote:
22 Oct 2017, 00:47
I can't help but feel CO's use battlefield executions so much because they just want to use that sweet metaba.
But can you really blame them for that?

User avatar
4thsurviver
Registered user
Posts: 176
Joined: 21 Jan 2017, 15:42
Byond: 4thsurviver

Re: Battlefield executions and you.

Post by 4thsurviver » 22 Oct 2017, 03:13

HappytoHelp wrote:
22 Oct 2017, 01:47
But can you really blame them for that?
No I really can't. That's why I'm happy to let Commanders join in on the firing squad.
Bran Jast. Over worked Bridge officer, uncaring MP, injured Marine. Shrug. Now without Robot Arm!

User avatar
shyshadow
Registered user
Posts: 491
Joined: 03 Jan 2017, 18:19
Location: In a Toaster
Byond: ShyShadow

Re: Battlefield executions and you.

Post by shyshadow » 22 Oct 2017, 03:17

4thsurviver wrote:
22 Oct 2017, 03:13
No I really can't. That's why I'm happy to let Commanders join in on the firing squad.
Which they should.....don't know why they removed that....
Image
^^^^Certified Neckbeard^^^^

User avatar
HR171
Registered user
Posts: 129
Joined: 31 Jul 2017, 17:42

Re: Battlefield executions and you.

Post by HR171 » 22 Oct 2017, 13:05

shyshadow wrote:
19 Oct 2017, 21:22
I agree fully with this statement, I've had the whitelist for about 3 to 4 months. I honestly don't remember, but not once have I actually battle field executed anyone. Maybe kind of, but it was more of a infection thing going on so. I don't count that as he was infected. I haven't done it once and I feel extremely pissed that COs think, because they can. Means they should. While you don't need to give a warning. Sometimes it's better to threaten with an execution, due to the fact if they are roleplaying properly, it should end in your favor.
yeah i agree with this, just cause you can do something doesn't mean you should, because from an RP point of view it will lower the marines morale and could start a mutiny, and from an OOC point of view its a bit of a dick move to kill someone for making a joke at your expense. Its like if you went into work made a joke about your boss so he fires you... it just wouldnt happen; unless you have a bad record for causing trouble or doing bad things.
Archie 'sunshine' Smith
the grumpiest PO in the air
or the crazy irish SO

User avatar
Sir Lordington
Registered user
Posts: 624
Joined: 07 Sep 2017, 03:43
Byond: Sirlordington

Re: Battlefield executions and you.

Post by Sir Lordington » 22 Oct 2017, 18:11

I've been reading this topic for a while now, intending to comment. However, I couldn't really find anything to actually say, because I don't even get the point of the topic anymore.

It seems to have been derailed into this "discussion" about these awful battlefield executions that happen when you insult the CO. Granted, I've seen them happen, but reading this thread one would think they are a common occurence. They really are not. Most executions I've seen or have performed myself are due to mutiny or flagrant insubordination. So I really don't get the point of saying over and over that executing people for insulting you is a bad thing. If someone calls you a dick once and you Mateba them, you can probably expect a bwoink or player report quite quickly. It simply isn't something that happens often, and this discussion risks becoming a circlejerk about those.

Now, allow me to get back to the point of the original post. Battlefield Executions are an RP tool. I've performed a couple. I've threatened with them a lot, most of the time without any actual intent to carry them out. They're an RP tool afforded to whitelisted players in their position as CO, and I don't see what's so wrong with them as long as they are not abused. I really don't see the big deal about dying for your RP. Dying IS a part of roleplay. It goes back to what Feweh said, this isn't some story where you are the hero. You don't have plot armour, it's not about YOUR RP, it's about THE RP, and death is part and result of it.

You, as a player, choose to roleplay a certain character who behaves in a certain way. You take IC actions, and those IC actions have IC consequences. If you take a certain course of action that steers you towards death, why should you be protected from it? I don't get how battlefield executions are different from anything else. Sure, they take you out of the round. Does perma not take you out of the round? Don't normal executions? It's an IC action like any other, and it's a part of Marine Law like any other. You are free to roleplay a character who stands up to their commander, disobeys their orders and spits in their face, but you know that you are liable to get shot for it. Just like you can play a character who hates MPs and breaks the law all the time, and you are liable to get brigged for it (and perma is not a difficult place to land in).

People need to accept that death is part of roleplay, and that it isn't such a big deal to be taken out of a round as the result of roleplay. Hell, it can be part of some of the greatest RP moments. Reno made reference to what I believe is his only battlefield execution ever. That battlefield execution was without a doubt one of the greatest RP moments I've had in the server, I was very happy when it happened and I was the guy being executed. I knew full well that if I stayed true to my character I would be battlefield executed. I knew it way before it actually happened, and I kept it up, because roleplaying demanded it of me. It demanded that I kept playing my character and that I died for my IC actions. I accepted that and it was great. I could've simply given in, taken other actions and avoided battlefield execution, but I accepted that my impending death was the consequence of roleplaying. Avoiding BEs is easy, really. Just don't play characters liable to get executed. But if you want to play strongly-principled characters that stand up to their COs you have to accept that you may be killed, just like if you play violent, hot-headed characters you may be permabrigged.

I've been on both sides of the Mateba several times, and the way I see it is some people are not willing to accept that death is part of RP, that your character may be killed due to RP, and that you have to own up to your actions. That manifests in many places, mind you, battlefield executions are just one of the most visible ones. But frankly, I just don't see the issue with BEs. Can they be abused? Sure, but If it seems unreasonable IC, call the MPs. If it seems unreasonable OOC, ahelp it.
I used to play Luke Compton. Now I play Reginald Dempsey.

User avatar
Philby0
Registered user
Posts: 199
Joined: 13 Jul 2017, 23:02
Byond: Philby

Re: Battlefield executions and you.

Post by Philby0 » 22 Oct 2017, 19:08

Sir Lordington wrote:
22 Oct 2017, 18:11
snip
This. All the reasons why I think BEs should definitely not go, nothing to add.

Agreed about the topic going off. I still hope to see more people supporting BEs sharing their general opinion.
Image

Post Reply