That covers almost all MP abuse, throwing multiple charges on something because they can. There's also the abuse of the min and max punishments, some MPs use max time only because "it's legal".NoahKirchner wrote: ↑29 May 2018, 18:30I think the solution is just a rewrite of marine law, honestly. I don't see the need for disorderly conduct when you also have hooliganism, because hooliganism will always = disorderly conduct but not vice versa, theoretically. Insubordination and neglect are pretty similar too, or at least can often be applied in the vast majority of cases. If you refuse a direct order to do something, that is simultaneously insubordination and neglect of duty, when it should really just be insubordination because of your refusal, and simply not doing necessary jobs would be neglect. I also don't see why disrespect is a crime in and of itself, when it would make a lot more sense to be a modifier to a crime without the ability to stack. Like for example, if you are insubordinate and you call your CO an "absolute mongoloid retard" it could certainly add 5 or 10 minutes to your time, but every subsequent perceived disrespect to the arresting officer is a bit extreme.
I understand why the disrespect stacks, but experience tells me it's useless. When someone insults you and you threaten to add disrespect, they're just gonna keep on typing insults until they reach perma. That's not a problem because they're pretty much directly asking to be put in perma at this point, but on the other hand some people get 4 disrespect charges for one sentence, so it's not really worth it.
I think the real problem with MPs isn't with marine law though, it's just the role. MPs are judge, jury and executioner, and unlike SS13's medical or engineering gameplay, social gameplay isn't a simplification of reality. You have real discussions with real people, and have to decide whether or not they're guilty and what punishment is fitting. Basically we aren't gonna get non griefy MPs unless we whitelist only law graduates.
I was thinking about adding an extra role, some sort of judge, a "law consultant" or something. MPs would still be allowed to brig people for up to 10 minutes, but for anything above that the suspect is brought before the judge, who declares whether they are innocent or guilty, and if guilty what punishment they will get, or maybe define the maximum punishment they will get, so the MP could decide to apply a lighter sentence.
This would bring balance, moderating griefy MPs, while not giving the judge too much power himself. The MPs would still have a lot to do, and the judge would have much more work than the CL
The judge could also deal with appeals, and be the 3rd person needed to authorise an execution. I think I'll go make a gitlab account....