A small rant about (some) Spec players

Ultimate badasses.
User avatar
Drevenshekel
Registered user
Posts: 76
Joined: 26 May 2018, 00:15
Byond: Drevenshekel

A small rant about (some) Spec players

Post by Drevenshekel » 16 Dec 2018, 09:46

I don't know whether its always been like this, but after playing alot of SL and SO recently i've started to notice a somewhat troubling trend with spec players. That being that their are far too many people who roll spec then act like an upgraded PFC who has a special rank that means they don't need to listen to orders. The Spec carries the biggest gun in the squad yes, but just as importantly they need to be ready to take charge if the SL goes down. They have a very high degree of responsibility to their squad but too many of them simply run off on their own or with other squads to selfishly chase kills. I feel like their should be a higher standard for spec players to uphold, a rambo PFC will simply get himself killed but a rambo spec who dies will leave their squad without their most powerful armaments which causes more marines to become vulnerable and die.

I think that if SL's can get job banned for refusing to listen to command than the same should go for spec players who refuse to cooperate either. Good or bad specs can make or break the round for the marines and I think too many players who are rolling spec roll it with the sole expectation that their going to be a one man army who never needs to communicate, lead or coordinate with his squadmates.
► Show Spoiler
Characters:
>Barry Packer
>Wamakahana Windhealer

User avatar
DefinitelyAlone0309
Registered user
Posts: 530
Joined: 21 Jan 2018, 10:42
Location: Almayer
Byond: DefinitelyAlone0309

Re: A small rant about (some) Spec players

Post by DefinitelyAlone0309 » 16 Dec 2018, 09:49

Time lock baby. We need lots of it. For basically every non-PFC role, with varying requirements for each role depending on its importance.

Xeno needs it too. Those bald queens and T3s are the leading reason on why xeno have been getting kicked pre and post mutation. But they don't need that big of a lock per say. Maybe like 1 hour as xeno to get T3 and 2 hours to get Queen. Should be enough to at least learn the mechanic and how the game plays out.
The one and only Bex Jackson

User avatar
Build_R_
Registered user
Posts: 370
Joined: 18 Nov 2017, 05:47
Location: Yes
Byond: Build_R_

Re: A small rant about (some) Spec players

Post by Build_R_ » 16 Dec 2018, 09:59

DefinitelyAlone0309 wrote:
16 Dec 2018, 09:49
Time lock baby. We need lots of it. For basically every non-PFC role, with varying requirements for each role depending on its importance.

Xeno needs it too. Those bald queens and T3s are the leading reason on why xeno have been getting kicked pre and post mutation. But they don't need that big of a lock per say. Maybe like 1 hour as xeno to get T3 and 2 hours to get Queen. Should be enough to at least learn the mechanic and how the game plays out.
It's a lot of older players that are doing it though, the issue is that people don't report specs wandering off since it's so common to try to rush in and get T3/Queen kills as a spec.
When the OB misfires and xenos are on your doorstep. 
Image                                                         Image  Howya, Jim Antonic- LCPL, PO, MP, SO, Husked Corpse. 

User avatar
solidfury7
Registered user
Posts: 737
Joined: 28 Jul 2016, 20:54

Re: A small rant about (some) Spec players

Post by solidfury7 » 16 Dec 2018, 10:01

Most specialists outright ignore the orders of SLs and Command to do what they want, and it's a big issue.

We should either address this in marine law (let MPs detain people planetside beyond the FOB if the crime extends to Neglect of Duty) or OOCly.

Having specialists refuse to lead their squad because they're running around trying to solo the hive is dumb.
Character
William 'Jester' Crimson
Roles
CMP
Captain
Staff Officer

User avatar
Steelpoint
Donor
Donor
Posts: 1432
Joined: 29 Jul 2015, 06:04
Byond: Steelpoint

Re: A small rant about (some) Spec players

Post by Steelpoint » 16 Dec 2018, 10:02

Being a Specialist grants you some of the most powerful guns the Marines have to offer. Naturally you are going to want to flex that privilege, which can be hard when your squad is stuck on FoB duty and you don't see action for over a hour.

Spec is indeed a odd role. Many people dislike how they are essentially the second in command of the squad and have those responsibilities, others may see it as a necessary requirement. I do agree that more needs to be done to address the rambo meta of the Spec role.

My biggest gripe with the Spec role is how I never get the damn role outside of low pop since everyone wants it. Also the stupid mini-game of rushing your prep room without eating, and praying to the RNG gods you spawn near your prep room instead of on the wrong side of the hall, so you have some chance of getting the kit you want. But I digress.
This is war, survival is your responsibility.

Alan Bentway: Marine
Kwei Ikthya-de: Predator

User avatar
Drevenshekel
Registered user
Posts: 76
Joined: 26 May 2018, 00:15
Byond: Drevenshekel

Re: A small rant about (some) Spec players

Post by Drevenshekel » 16 Dec 2018, 10:03

Build_R_ wrote:
16 Dec 2018, 09:59
It's a lot of older players that are doing it though, the issue is that people don't report specs wandering off since it's so common to try to rush in and get T3/Queen kills as a spec.
Would admins even take reports on rambo specs seriously?
► Show Spoiler
Characters:
>Barry Packer
>Wamakahana Windhealer

User avatar
Build_R_
Registered user
Posts: 370
Joined: 18 Nov 2017, 05:47
Location: Yes
Byond: Build_R_

Re: A small rant about (some) Spec players

Post by Build_R_ » 16 Dec 2018, 10:04

Drevenshekel wrote:
16 Dec 2018, 10:03
Would admins even take reports on rambo specs seriously?
If it was very clear that they were ramboing, I would think so. But at most it would probably only warrant a warning unless they're getting reported a lot for ramboing.
When the OB misfires and xenos are on your doorstep. 
Image                                                         Image  Howya, Jim Antonic- LCPL, PO, MP, SO, Husked Corpse. 

User avatar
Steelpoint
Donor
Donor
Posts: 1432
Joined: 29 Jul 2015, 06:04
Byond: Steelpoint

Re: A small rant about (some) Spec players

Post by Steelpoint » 16 Dec 2018, 10:06

The issue there is that you have some squads off doing non-combat operations, such as patrolling or the SL is taking their sweet time. So the Spec decides that their firepower is really needed on the frontline so they rush off to help.

Heck, maybe Specs should be in their own squad to act as a QRF or something. That'd be amusing.
This is war, survival is your responsibility.

Alan Bentway: Marine
Kwei Ikthya-de: Predator

User avatar
Drevenshekel
Registered user
Posts: 76
Joined: 26 May 2018, 00:15
Byond: Drevenshekel

Re: A small rant about (some) Spec players

Post by Drevenshekel » 16 Dec 2018, 10:07

Steelpoint wrote:
16 Dec 2018, 10:02
Being a Specialist grants you some of the most powerful guns the Marines have to offer. Naturally you are going to want to flex that privilege, which can be hard when your squad is stuck on FoB duty and you don't see action for over a hour.

Spec is indeed a odd role. Many people dislike how they are essentially the second in command of the squad and have those responsibilities, others may see it as a necessary requirement. I do agree that more needs to be done to address the rambo meta of the Spec role.

My biggest gripe with the Spec role is how I never get the damn role outside of low pop since everyone wants it. Also the stupid mini-game of rushing your prep room without eating, and praying to the RNG gods you spawn near your prep room instead of on the wrong side of the hall, so you have some chance of getting the kit you want. But I digress.
Your third point is another big gripe of mine, I enjoy playing Spec for both the big gun and also the chance to lead the squad when the SL inevitably dies to friendly fire. I think if it was made clear that stricter spec standards were going to be upheld then it might cause less people to roll for it simply to get the big unga dunga. I also understand that their is nothing worse than finally getting that spec roll for the first time in a week and then being stuck at the FoB, whenever im SL of fob duty I'll give my spec command of a QRF/patrol team and give them some autonomy, but sometimes I cant even trust them to do that because so many specs are silent edgelords who never communicate.
► Show Spoiler
Characters:
>Barry Packer
>Wamakahana Windhealer

User avatar
Sulaboy
Registered user
Posts: 782
Joined: 14 Jan 2018, 04:10
Location: Florida
Byond: Sulaboy
Steam: Danger

Re: A small rant about (some) Spec players

Post by Sulaboy » 16 Dec 2018, 11:28

Squad leaders recently got a rule change that gives them some obligation to follow the CIC's orders. What are your thoughts on adding some OOC expectations of specialists?

With it being a higher ranking role in the squad something about leading in the SL's absence, and following the SLs orders could be interesting. We could chalk it up to their training resulting in the position being more disciplined than the standard grunt.
Clancy 'Danger' Long
Ethan
A̸̧̭̰̮̰̜̥͈̱̲̫̲̭͋̄̈̍̉̓̿̊̃H̸͈̬̗̓̄̒̇̿̀̏̎͑͊̇̃̇͝Ĥ̴̨̧̨̩̞̗̤͝ͅH̴͔͕͊̄̓̐̀͝

User avatar
Steelpoint
Donor
Donor
Posts: 1432
Joined: 29 Jul 2015, 06:04
Byond: Steelpoint

Re: A small rant about (some) Spec players

Post by Steelpoint » 16 Dec 2018, 11:49

The lore indicates that the majority of the rank and file grunts on the Almayer are mostly newer Recruits or Conscripts, you could chalk it up that the Specialists are veteran Marines brought in from another battalion and hence they have a higher standard of discipline to justify a OOC alteration.
This is war, survival is your responsibility.

Alan Bentway: Marine
Kwei Ikthya-de: Predator

User avatar
Szunti
Registered user
Posts: 293
Joined: 10 Dec 2015, 17:18

Re: A small rant about (some) Spec players

Post by Szunti » 16 Dec 2018, 12:00

While I agree specs should be held to higher standards, I don't think they should be second in lead. When a player gets spec, that's really rare, there are even different kits which need to be played differently. They need the round to experiment and find out how to use their equipment efficiently.
When you are leading you need to communicate a lot instead of shooting. Even worse when someone has spec for the first time and he is both learning leading, working with SOs and handling the weapon. That's totally unfair and just wasting a round which could have been fun for said player.

User avatar
Grubstank
Registered user
Posts: 231
Joined: 21 May 2018, 15:40
Byond: Grubstank

Re: A small rant about (some) Spec players

Post by Grubstank » 16 Dec 2018, 12:19

A spec focusing on leading the squad is a spec wasted; but I agree something needs to be done about the rambo problem.
Andres Addison

User avatar
Blade2000Br
Registered user
Posts: 730
Joined: 12 Jun 2017, 14:09
Byond: blade2000br

Re: A small rant about (some) Spec players

Post by Blade2000Br » 16 Dec 2018, 13:06

In my Sl days, I would often make my Specs a FT with some marines and given then some autonomy. If they would act right and follow orders, I would even allow then to go in the frontline if they are a offensive type of spec.

But yeahvm, therevis a problem with specs that should be afressed.
Jason 'Punk' Crowmel - The guy that don't give a shit about what he does.

Former Rapey Ravager Hater.

User avatar
Garrison
Registered user
Posts: 439
Joined: 08 Apr 2017, 02:42
Byond: SimMiner

Re: A small rant about (some) Spec players

Post by Garrison » 16 Dec 2018, 15:41

In my opinion, you shouldn't be expecting the high risk, high reward specs to be sticking back and following the chain of command. (Looking at Scout, RPG and possibily Pryo)

Why's that? Cause they wield so much killing/suppressing potential that it's a liability and not fun if they are forced to stick back and wait for the operation to likely go to hell when specs are often renowned for turning the tide single handed.

Another big reason is just how hard it is to become a specialist. When you finally get the role, let alone the exact kit you want. You want to do what you've been dreaming to do. Not sitting back when you could finally be flexing that powerful gun and equipment you've been wishing to get for so long.

EDIT: to add to the last point, I've only gotten to be a spec around 6 times since I started playing CM. Including when Smart Gunner was considered a spec kit.
Last edited by Garrison on 16 Dec 2018, 15:47, edited 2 times in total.
LCpl. Raul Garrison: That nobody with a gun
Dr. Arthur Bennet: The guy you plead to fix you
Lt. Elizabeth Owens: The lady who won't stop badgering.

User avatar
Weaselburg
Registered user
Posts: 589
Joined: 15 Feb 2018, 19:22
Location: Splattered against the wall
Byond: Weaselburg

Re: A small rant about (some) Spec players

Post by Weaselburg » 16 Dec 2018, 15:46

Garrison wrote:
16 Dec 2018, 15:41
In my opinion, you shouldn't be expecting the high risk, high reward specs to be sticking back and following the chain of command. (Looking at Scout, RPG and possibily Pryo)

Why's that? Cause they wield so much killing/suppressing potential that it's a liability and not fun if they are forced to stick back and wait for the operation to likely go to hell when specs are often renowned for turning the tide single handed.

Another big reason is just how hard it is to become a specialist. When you finally get the role, let alone the exact kit you want. You want to do what you've been dreaming to do. Not sitting back when you could finally be flexing that powerful gun and equipment you've been wishing to get for so long.
No one expects Scouts to stay behind the lines, but we are talking about people just ignoring ALL orders and trying to solo the hive. They MUST stick to other marines or they WILL die (Scout is a exception). They don't do that.
Hivemind, Elite Runner (320) (follow) hisses, 'SORRY I STEPPED ON THE BUTTON MA.
Kaptin Morgan: we must unite to collect the shattered pieces of the tribes code that are spread among the 16 feweh alts
Hivemind, Mature Crusher (21) hisses, 'I CAN MEME AGAIN'
You know, it really surprised me when IKEA bought Disney.- The biggest surprise was KFC buying IBM, to be honest
Philby0 wrote: They're so white they can colonise anything at will
PFC Rex Lombardi shouts, "Boys if you jump out of the dropship you are guarenteed a pass into the paratroopers regiment!"
OOC: Jakkkk: weaselburg got t o u c h e d
OOC: Driecg36: a sentient demon had taken residence in shutte code
OOC: Daswurmtmich: GIBING WILL CONTINUE UNTIL MORALE IMPROVES

User avatar
Boersgard
Registered user
Posts: 83
Joined: 25 Nov 2018, 07:22

Re: A small rant about (some) Spec players

Post by Boersgard » 16 Dec 2018, 19:29

DefinitelyAlone0309 wrote:
16 Dec 2018, 09:49
Time lock baby. We need lots of it. For basically every non-PFC role, with varying requirements for each role depending on its importance.

Xeno needs it too. Those bald queens and T3s are the leading reason on why xeno have been getting kicked pre and post mutation. But they don't need that big of a lock per say. Maybe like 1 hour as xeno to get T3 and 2 hours to get Queen. Should be enough to at least learn the mechanic and how the game plays out.
Timelock won't solve this problem. It's not the new players ignoring orders and running off on their own, it's the old experienced players doing it.

User avatar
Boersgard
Registered user
Posts: 83
Joined: 25 Nov 2018, 07:22

Re: A small rant about (some) Spec players

Post by Boersgard » 16 Dec 2018, 19:37

Szunti wrote:
16 Dec 2018, 12:00
While I agree specs should be held to higher standards, I don't think they should be second in lead. When a player gets spec, that's really rare, there are even different kits which need to be played differently. They need the round to experiment and find out how to use their equipment efficiently.
When you are leading you need to communicate a lot instead of shooting. Even worse when someone has spec for the first time and he is both learning leading, working with SOs and handling the weapon. That's totally unfair and just wasting a round which could have been fun for said player.
Specs shouldn't be 2IC, I agree. When you're killy by yourself, you concentrate on getting into position to do your work - it's very difficult to do that AND manage a squad at the same time. Usually the best 2IC for a squad is the random PFC's who can now turn the squad into their effective weapon without having to worry about anything else. Medics, and to a lesser degree engineers, also make bad squad leaders.

IMO squad leadership options go best in this order:
SL
[Radioman if we had one]
Smartgunner
PFC's
Specs
Engineers
Medics (never make these aSLs)

User avatar
Drevenshekel
Registered user
Posts: 76
Joined: 26 May 2018, 00:15
Byond: Drevenshekel

Re: A small rant about (some) Spec players

Post by Drevenshekel » 16 Dec 2018, 20:17

Boersgard wrote:
16 Dec 2018, 19:37
Specs shouldn't be 2IC, I agree. When you're killy by yourself, you concentrate on getting into position to do your work - it's very difficult to do that AND manage a squad at the same time. Usually the best 2IC for a squad is the random PFC's who can now turn the squad into their effective weapon without having to worry about anything else. Medics, and to a lesser degree engineers, also make bad squad leaders.

IMO squad leadership options go best in this order:
SL
[Radioman if we had one]
Smartgunner
PFC's
Specs
Engineers
Medics (never make these aSLs)

A radioman would be a great new support class in my opinion, give him a backpack mounted radio that could act as a squad comms relay if tcomms are down and maybe some other support items such as bino's. They could be like what the XO is to the CO but on a squad level, let new players get a feel for command and communication without having to jump straight into SL (I'm sure its not only me who found it daunting to first leap into SLing). They could also take some pressure of the SL by relaying messages to and from command while the SL is busy barking out orders and shooting xenos.
► Show Spoiler
Characters:
>Barry Packer
>Wamakahana Windhealer

User avatar
Vispain
Registered user
Posts: 459
Joined: 13 Sep 2017, 19:43
Location: U. S. A
Byond: Vispain

Re: A small rant about (some) Spec players

Post by Vispain » 16 Dec 2018, 21:01

A radioman would be cool.

As for squad leadership...
It is entirely possible for a Specialist or any other rank to lead a squad.

As always, leadership should go by rank. No one is going to trust a Pfc with major leadership decisions. The only rank that TRULY can't lead a squad is Medic, and that's just because they are typically always patching together marines.

I'm more likely to listen to someone of higher rank then just about any Pfc. Why? Because most Pfcs tend to be meme machines, untrustworthy or unwilling to lead.
St Joseph of Cupertino - Patron saint of air travelers, aviators, astronauts, people with a mental handicaps, test takers and poor students.
Commander Jacque Devereaux AKA SSGT Cassius 'Santa' Klaus Predator: Pau'Tar Image

User avatar
Drevenshekel
Registered user
Posts: 76
Joined: 26 May 2018, 00:15
Byond: Drevenshekel

Re: A small rant about (some) Spec players

Post by Drevenshekel » 16 Dec 2018, 21:38

Vispain wrote:
16 Dec 2018, 21:01
A radioman would be cool.

As for squad leadership...
It is entirely possible for a Specialist or any other rank to lead a squad.

As always, leadership should go by rank. No one is going to trust a Pfc with major leadership decisions. The only rank that TRULY can't lead a squad is Medic, and that's just because they are typically always patching together marines.

I'm more likely to listen to someone of higher rank then just about any Pfc. Why? Because most Pfcs tend to be meme machines, untrustworthy or unwilling to lead.
Yeah exactly, its more than possible to play spec and lead a squad at the same time. Its just basic communication skills, if your unable to multitask then you should be playing as a PFC. Medics being the exception since they already have so much on their plate. Marines are also more likely to follow a spec rather than some random PFC, even if its a well known PFC the ungas will want to stick with the guy with the bigger gun.
► Show Spoiler
Characters:
>Barry Packer
>Wamakahana Windhealer

User avatar
David Stormwell
Registered user
Posts: 243
Joined: 01 Jul 2018, 00:23
Location: Midwest USA
Byond: David Stormwell

Re: A small rant about (some) Spec players

Post by David Stormwell » 16 Dec 2018, 22:32

There is also upsides to having a Media SL once in a while, although it depends on the medics Plays style of course, let's say SLs all supposed to report to command and get out orders, Also Medics also know about how many Marines are in fighting Condition
They Which Play with the Devils Rattles, Will Be Brought by Degrees to Wield His Sword
-Buckmister Fuller

User avatar
Kineem
Registered user
Posts: 103
Joined: 29 Mar 2018, 19:26
Byond: Kineem

Re: A small rant about (some) Spec players

Post by Kineem » 16 Dec 2018, 23:21

when I play specialist I refuse to stick to my squad if the orders we're given mean we won't be able to see combat and the SL doesn't want me to go to the frontlines

i'm fine with being an aSL. if I'm in Delta and we have a really bad SL i actually hope they die super early on so that way I can take control of the squad for the rest of the boys.
Chance Warden
William Strangelove

User avatar
Drevenshekel
Registered user
Posts: 76
Joined: 26 May 2018, 00:15
Byond: Drevenshekel

Re: A small rant about (some) Spec players

Post by Drevenshekel » 16 Dec 2018, 23:33

Kineem wrote:
16 Dec 2018, 23:21
when I play specialist I refuse to stick to my squad if the orders we're given mean we won't be able to see combat and the SL doesn't want me to go to the frontlines

i'm fine with being an aSL. if I'm in Delta and we have a really bad SL i actually hope they die super early on so that way I can take control of the squad for the rest of the boys.
While it sucks to roll spec and get FoB duty, and a good SL should let the spec go to the frontline with a QRF to help in the battle. I still think it's a good attitude to listen to your SL, atleast in my experience whenever I have a spec that refuses to stick with the squad it passes down to the PFC's who will also see no reason to stick with the squad and what ends up is a completely disorganised squad and a very stressed out SO and SL.
► Show Spoiler
Characters:
>Barry Packer
>Wamakahana Windhealer

User avatar
RuAlastor
Registered user
Posts: 51
Joined: 29 Oct 2018, 05:11
Location: Moscow, Russia
Byond: RuAlastor
Steam: RuAlastor

Re: A small rant about (some) Spec players

Post by RuAlastor » 17 Dec 2018, 00:34

Build_R_ wrote:
16 Dec 2018, 09:59
It's a lot of older players that are doing it though, the issue is that people don't report specs wandering off since it's so common to try to rush in and get T3/Queen kills as a spec.
Once I was playing as SL and my spec wandered of with other squad and died. First, I tried to call him back. He didn’t even answer to me. I reported to XO before his death. No reaction. I ahelped. That’s IC issue.
You can’t make people follow the rule if there’s no punishment.

Post Reply