Why not using the Alamo as a transport is a bad idea:

Generic, on-topic discussion about Colonial Marines.
Post Reply

User avatar
Karmac
Registered user
Posts: 2458
Joined: 08 Aug 2016, 00:29
Location: 'Straya
Byond: Karmac
Steam: Karmac

Re: Why not using the Alamo as a transport is a bad idea:

Post by Karmac » 19 Jun 2017, 00:29

The way LZ's and Dropships are at the moment, using LZ2 at all is pointless and setting the Normandy for fire missions and only fire missions is the best idea anyone ever had. Once devs sort out the sentry gun issues putting those on DS1 along with the inside-smartgun nest will be the best way to load up the Alamo. Double GAU's and Single Missile Pods on the Alamo with the targeting system is the way to go, keep the min-rocket pods nearby for when you run out of Missiles as well.
Garth Pawolski, or is it Powalski?

Back in action.

User avatar
jusa297
Registered user
Posts: 232
Joined: 20 Jan 2017, 19:48
Byond: jusa297

Re: Why not using the Alamo as a transport is a bad idea:

Post by jusa297 » 19 Jun 2017, 01:24

What karmac said. Normandy is better for firing missions because no one uses lz2.
Best interaction with i've had:
Image

I love you papa feweh, god bless.

LostPlayed a round as an Ancient Runner and Ancient Hunter. I still suck at alien though : ^)

User avatar
Jeser
Registered user
Posts: 1119
Joined: 04 Mar 2015, 00:47
Location: Donetsk, Ukraine

Re: Why not using the Alamo as a transport is a bad idea:

Post by Jeser » 19 Jun 2017, 01:44

Yep, There is no sense in using DS2, no strategic points near LZ2, no resources that can be accessible only from there. Almost impossible to defend from aliens and it's a common sense to use Nexus as FoB, so dividing resources to hold LZ2 never lead to something good. I'd prefer lay on the floor in DS1 than deploy on DS2 and find out in 15 minutes that DS2 PO is torned to pieces and DS2 already lost. Nah, thanks.
Jeser "Fox" Aushwitz.
Jeser believes only in one thing - common sense.

Image
Image
Apop's permission: Click

User avatar
Crab_Spider
Registered user
Posts: 2114
Joined: 20 Aug 2016, 15:52
Byond: Krab_Spider

Re: Why not using the Alamo as a transport is a bad idea:

Post by Crab_Spider » 19 Jun 2017, 06:51

Jeser wrote:Yep, There is no sense in using DS2, no strategic points near LZ2, no resources that can be accessible only from there. Almost impossible to defend from aliens and it's a common sense to use Nexus as FoB, so dividing resources to hold LZ2 never lead to something good. I'd prefer lay on the floor in DS1 than deploy on DS2 and find out in 15 minutes that DS2 PO is torned to pieces and DS2 already lost. Nah, thanks.
So Robotics, medbay, and Secure Storage are not strategic points?
You will never be as bad as the baldie who picked up a tactical shotgun while a hunter was pouncing on top of a CMO for 4 seconds, with his only response being to pace around before being decap'd by said hunter. You are not Brett Kimple, and you never will be. You are not the reason why I regular MP.

I am John "Buckshot" Rhodes, the Tactical Snowflake Hunter

User avatar
Jeser
Registered user
Posts: 1119
Joined: 04 Mar 2015, 00:47
Location: Donetsk, Ukraine

Re: Why not using the Alamo as a transport is a bad idea:

Post by Jeser » 19 Jun 2017, 07:08

Crab_Spider wrote:So Robotics, medbay, and Secure Storage are not strategic points?
Medbay is accessible from hydro -> from Nexus. Robotics is useless, Secure storage was used as a FoB when LZ2 was back near it, now it almost never used and no viable stuff in there, so, yes, not strategic points.
Jeser "Fox" Aushwitz.
Jeser believes only in one thing - common sense.

Image
Image
Apop's permission: Click

User avatar
WinterClould
Registered user
Posts: 990
Joined: 11 Jun 2017, 02:30
Location: Boogie Wonderland
Byond: WinterClould
Steam: 『WinterClould』

Re: Why not using the Alamo as a transport is a bad idea:

Post by WinterClould » 19 Jun 2017, 07:11

Crab_Spider wrote:So Robotics, medbay, and Secure Storage are not strategic points?
After a quick one time scouting run I'd say they are completely pointless places to be. When holding the Nexus and Hydro are so much more important I don't see a point in bothering with those places. Maybe today or tomorrow a CO like Carson will come up with a crazy plan where we hold Internal Affairs instead of the Nexus.
Chen "DiscoKing" Westinton Proud recipient of the "Realest Nigga on the Bloc" Award. My Dossier, it's good. Trust me. Read it.
Secondary Objective: Stay Safe, Stick Together, Kick the ass of anything that might need an ass kicking. If you find any booze bring it up to CIC for me please.
Not everyone who lost their life on Space Nam' died there. Not everyone who came home from Space Nam' ever left there.
Image

User avatar
Steven Sneider
Registered user
Posts: 146
Joined: 30 Apr 2015, 15:29
Location: Albania
Byond: Shanghili

Re: Why not using the Alamo as a transport is a bad idea:

Post by Steven Sneider » 19 Jun 2017, 07:12

Crab_Spider wrote:So Robotics, medbay, and Secure Storage are not strategic points?
Nothing worth in those places to be honest
NO MERCY! NO RESPITE!

User avatar
Crab_Spider
Registered user
Posts: 2114
Joined: 20 Aug 2016, 15:52
Byond: Krab_Spider

Re: Why not using the Alamo as a transport is a bad idea:

Post by Crab_Spider » 19 Jun 2017, 07:34

Jeser wrote:Medbay is accessible from hydro -> from Nexus. Robotics is useless, Secure storage was used as a FoB when LZ2 was back near it, now it almost never used and no viable stuff in there, so, yes, not strategic points.
I don't think you understand what you're trying to dismiss.
You will never be as bad as the baldie who picked up a tactical shotgun while a hunter was pouncing on top of a CMO for 4 seconds, with his only response being to pace around before being decap'd by said hunter. You are not Brett Kimple, and you never will be. You are not the reason why I regular MP.

I am John "Buckshot" Rhodes, the Tactical Snowflake Hunter

Barent
Registered user
Posts: 7
Joined: 24 May 2017, 15:18
Byond: Barent

Re: Why not using the Alamo as a transport is a bad idea:

Post by Barent » 19 Jun 2017, 11:12

I would argue that designating Normandy as fire support right off the bat is a bit meta, since you don't know that you're going to be having a huge battle with a bunch of aliens down there....

User avatar
Karmac
Registered user
Posts: 2458
Joined: 08 Aug 2016, 00:29
Location: 'Straya
Byond: Karmac
Steam: Karmac

Re: Why not using the Alamo as a transport is a bad idea:

Post by Karmac » 19 Jun 2017, 11:20

We don't know anything Barent, having a dropship prepped for gunruns is more of a precaution than anything else.
Garth Pawolski, or is it Powalski?

Back in action.

Barent
Registered user
Posts: 7
Joined: 24 May 2017, 15:18
Byond: Barent

Re: Why not using the Alamo as a transport is a bad idea:

Post by Barent » 19 Jun 2017, 12:24

I suppose; it's still pretty inefficient for getting marines on the ground for a distress call but I'm not a CO so maybe it's tactical genius.

User avatar
Steven Sneider
Registered user
Posts: 146
Joined: 30 Apr 2015, 15:29
Location: Albania
Byond: Shanghili

Re: Why not using the Alamo as a transport is a bad idea:

Post by Steven Sneider » 19 Jun 2017, 12:57

heck if the CO wants to he can send two squads at a time.
NO MERCY! NO RESPITE!

Post Reply