Why not using the Alamo as a transport is a bad idea:
- SpecialAgentOrange
- Registered user
- Posts: 83
- Joined: 01 Jun 2016, 04:33
- Karmac
- Registered user
- Posts: 2458
- Joined: 08 Aug 2016, 00:29
- Location: 'Straya
- Byond: Karmac
- Steam: Karmac
Re: Why not using the Alamo as a transport is a bad idea:
The way LZ's and Dropships are at the moment, using LZ2 at all is pointless and setting the Normandy for fire missions and only fire missions is the best idea anyone ever had. Once devs sort out the sentry gun issues putting those on DS1 along with the inside-smartgun nest will be the best way to load up the Alamo. Double GAU's and Single Missile Pods on the Alamo with the targeting system is the way to go, keep the min-rocket pods nearby for when you run out of Missiles as well.
Garth Pawolski, or is it Powalski?
Back in action.
Back in action.
- jusa297
- Registered user
- Posts: 232
- Joined: 20 Jan 2017, 19:48
- Byond: jusa297
Re: Why not using the Alamo as a transport is a bad idea:
What karmac said. Normandy is better for firing missions because no one uses lz2.
Best interaction with i've had:
I love you papa feweh, god bless.
LostPlayed a round as an Ancient Runner and Ancient Hunter. I still suck at alien though : ^)
I love you papa feweh, god bless.
LostPlayed a round as an Ancient Runner and Ancient Hunter. I still suck at alien though : ^)
- Jeser
- Registered user
- Posts: 1119
- Joined: 04 Mar 2015, 00:47
- Location: Donetsk, Ukraine
Re: Why not using the Alamo as a transport is a bad idea:
Yep, There is no sense in using DS2, no strategic points near LZ2, no resources that can be accessible only from there. Almost impossible to defend from aliens and it's a common sense to use Nexus as FoB, so dividing resources to hold LZ2 never lead to something good. I'd prefer lay on the floor in DS1 than deploy on DS2 and find out in 15 minutes that DS2 PO is torned to pieces and DS2 already lost. Nah, thanks.
- Crab_Spider
- Registered user
- Posts: 2114
- Joined: 20 Aug 2016, 15:52
- Byond: Krab_Spider
Re: Why not using the Alamo as a transport is a bad idea:
So Robotics, medbay, and Secure Storage are not strategic points?Jeser wrote:Yep, There is no sense in using DS2, no strategic points near LZ2, no resources that can be accessible only from there. Almost impossible to defend from aliens and it's a common sense to use Nexus as FoB, so dividing resources to hold LZ2 never lead to something good. I'd prefer lay on the floor in DS1 than deploy on DS2 and find out in 15 minutes that DS2 PO is torned to pieces and DS2 already lost. Nah, thanks.
You will never be as bad as the baldie who picked up a tactical shotgun while a hunter was pouncing on top of a CMO for 4 seconds, with his only response being to pace around before being decap'd by said hunter. You are not Brett Kimple, and you never will be. You are not the reason why I regular MP.
I am John "Buckshot" Rhodes, the Tactical Snowflake Hunter
I am John "Buckshot" Rhodes, the Tactical Snowflake Hunter
- Jeser
- Registered user
- Posts: 1119
- Joined: 04 Mar 2015, 00:47
- Location: Donetsk, Ukraine
Re: Why not using the Alamo as a transport is a bad idea:
Medbay is accessible from hydro -> from Nexus. Robotics is useless, Secure storage was used as a FoB when LZ2 was back near it, now it almost never used and no viable stuff in there, so, yes, not strategic points.Crab_Spider wrote:So Robotics, medbay, and Secure Storage are not strategic points?
- WinterClould
- Registered user
- Posts: 990
- Joined: 11 Jun 2017, 02:30
- Location: Boogie Wonderland
- Byond: WinterClould
- Steam: 『WinterClould』
Re: Why not using the Alamo as a transport is a bad idea:
After a quick one time scouting run I'd say they are completely pointless places to be. When holding the Nexus and Hydro are so much more important I don't see a point in bothering with those places. Maybe today or tomorrow a CO like Carson will come up with a crazy plan where we hold Internal Affairs instead of the Nexus.Crab_Spider wrote:So Robotics, medbay, and Secure Storage are not strategic points?
Chen "DiscoKing" Westinton Proud recipient of the "Realest Nigga on the Bloc" Award. My Dossier, it's good. Trust me. Read it.
Secondary Objective: Stay Safe, Stick Together, Kick the ass of anything that might need an ass kicking. If you find any booze bring it up to CIC for me please.
Not everyone who lost their life on Space Nam' died there. Not everyone who came home from Space Nam' ever left there.
Secondary Objective: Stay Safe, Stick Together, Kick the ass of anything that might need an ass kicking. If you find any booze bring it up to CIC for me please.
Not everyone who lost their life on Space Nam' died there. Not everyone who came home from Space Nam' ever left there.
- Steven Sneider
- Registered user
- Posts: 146
- Joined: 30 Apr 2015, 15:29
- Location: Albania
- Byond: Shanghili
Re: Why not using the Alamo as a transport is a bad idea:
Nothing worth in those places to be honestCrab_Spider wrote:So Robotics, medbay, and Secure Storage are not strategic points?
NO MERCY! NO RESPITE!
- Crab_Spider
- Registered user
- Posts: 2114
- Joined: 20 Aug 2016, 15:52
- Byond: Krab_Spider
Re: Why not using the Alamo as a transport is a bad idea:
I don't think you understand what you're trying to dismiss.Jeser wrote:Medbay is accessible from hydro -> from Nexus. Robotics is useless, Secure storage was used as a FoB when LZ2 was back near it, now it almost never used and no viable stuff in there, so, yes, not strategic points.
You will never be as bad as the baldie who picked up a tactical shotgun while a hunter was pouncing on top of a CMO for 4 seconds, with his only response being to pace around before being decap'd by said hunter. You are not Brett Kimple, and you never will be. You are not the reason why I regular MP.
I am John "Buckshot" Rhodes, the Tactical Snowflake Hunter
I am John "Buckshot" Rhodes, the Tactical Snowflake Hunter
-
- Registered user
- Posts: 7
- Joined: 24 May 2017, 15:18
- Byond: Barent
Re: Why not using the Alamo as a transport is a bad idea:
I would argue that designating Normandy as fire support right off the bat is a bit meta, since you don't know that you're going to be having a huge battle with a bunch of aliens down there....
- Karmac
- Registered user
- Posts: 2458
- Joined: 08 Aug 2016, 00:29
- Location: 'Straya
- Byond: Karmac
- Steam: Karmac
Re: Why not using the Alamo as a transport is a bad idea:
We don't know anything Barent, having a dropship prepped for gunruns is more of a precaution than anything else.
Garth Pawolski, or is it Powalski?
Back in action.
Back in action.
-
- Registered user
- Posts: 7
- Joined: 24 May 2017, 15:18
- Byond: Barent
Re: Why not using the Alamo as a transport is a bad idea:
I suppose; it's still pretty inefficient for getting marines on the ground for a distress call but I'm not a CO so maybe it's tactical genius.
- Steven Sneider
- Registered user
- Posts: 146
- Joined: 30 Apr 2015, 15:29
- Location: Albania
- Byond: Shanghili
Re: Why not using the Alamo as a transport is a bad idea:
heck if the CO wants to he can send two squads at a time.
NO MERCY! NO RESPITE!