Idk I just think that it would feel more military like if we werent all painted with bright colors, I mean wouldnt it look cooler with just the base color of our armor?
Say what you think, id like to know.

Yes, actually I color everyones face by hand and write their name down in my journal every round.ImHereToHelp wrote: ↑30 Sep 2017, 19:24The colors are for the player's sake. Do you memorize the pixel combination of everyone's face?
A tag for what? Their role?ExpoStealth wrote: ↑30 Sep 2017, 19:27Yes, actually I color everyones face by hand and write their name down in my journal every round.
Thats why everyone would have a tag beside their head.
The small square that every role besides PFC has, might as well give it to PFC's too.ImHereToHelp wrote: ↑30 Sep 2017, 19:29A tag for what? Their role?
That's a lot of floating symbols.
Yes I know that is the main point of the colors, but it just feels childish after a while. Like arent we suppose to be tough, scary, space murins? Not some toy soldier with bright red, or purple on them.
A small colored symbol for each squad would appear next to standards, just like with specs, SLs, medics, smartgunners, and engineers. Yes, there would be more icons and it may be annoying. However, if they were reduced in size and made more transparent, that would greatly help reduce the eyesore of it all.SecretStamos (Joshuu) wrote: ↑02 Oct 2017, 06:22This is actually something we've given a lot of thought. The colors really diminish from the armor, but they serve a very important gameplay function.
We're definitely interested in hearing potential alternatives.
Honestly the little tags for every squad member but PFC's is what i look for, they could even make the PFC's just have a tiny one or somethin, just showing they are Bravo PFC.Trench007 wrote: ↑02 Oct 2017, 07:17A small colored symbol for each squad would appear next to standards, just like with specs, SLs, medics, smartgunners, and engineers. Yes, there would be more icons and it may be annoying. However, if they were reduced in size and made more transparent, that would greatly help reduce the eyesore of it all.
It probably wouldn't be that hard to test, have one round with them and see what player responses are like.
(I know the OP basically said this, but this has 'added clarification' in it)
The complaint is not that it's too hard to see who belongs to what squad, but that the armor looks cartoonish with the bright colors.Renomaki wrote: ↑02 Oct 2017, 22:23am I the only one who has no trouble noticing squad colors?
No wonder people friendly fire each other so often, they don't seem to have the most basic of observational skills. I was willing to tolerate giving special roles icons, but I don't think EVERY SINGLE MARINE needs a giant square next to them. It would just feel awkwardly cluttered.
If you really need a more blatant indicator of who belongs to who, maybe changing how armor is detailed. Maybe more obvious coloring instead of small lines might do the trick. Maybe something like... This?
https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File ... _Gules.svg
That is a good alternative though, instead of the bright long lines and such, just a nice visible but not huge like path on the arm, peck, or back, maybe helmet too.Renomaki wrote: ↑02 Oct 2017, 22:23am I the only one who has no trouble noticing squad colors?
No wonder people friendly fire each other so often, they don't seem to have the most basic of observational skills. I was willing to tolerate giving special roles icons, but I don't think EVERY SINGLE MARINE needs a giant square next to them. It would just feel awkwardly cluttered.
If you really need a more blatant indicator of who belongs to who, maybe changing how armor is detailed. Maybe more obvious coloring instead of small lines might do the trick. Maybe something like... This?
https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File ... _Gules.svg
It wasn't what I meant.SecretStamos (Joshuu) wrote: ↑02 Oct 2017, 23:30That's not a good alternative. A shield decal won't read visually on the armor or helmet given the very limited space we have.