The general bullshit in arguments over Ripley Mechs

Generic, on-topic discussion about Colonial Marines.
User avatar
Evilkyle24
Registered user
Posts: 539
Joined: 30 May 2015, 21:46

Re: The general bullshit in arguments over Ripley Mechs

Post by Evilkyle24 » 08 Sep 2015, 13:55

UnknownMurder wrote:Or... Take a different route? Or ... Wait it out. Coming back and forth twice is faster than carrying two crates. I've conducted this experiment before. Who in their mind would drag it across a horde.
Implying that anyone who plays on this server space station 13 is in their right mind.
Image

User avatar
Kreydis
Registered user
Posts: 73
Joined: 25 Feb 2015, 01:45

Re: The general bullshit in arguments over Ripley Mechs

Post by Kreydis » 08 Sep 2015, 14:32

UnknownMurder wrote:Who in their mind would drag it across a horde.
Cargo techs man... They just don't understand. Also at the start of the round there's about 10 different crates (3 o2 containers) that I usually bring to cargo, O2 to store in a better place, and crates for points.

User avatar
1138
Donor
Donor
Posts: 162
Joined: 30 Jun 2015, 03:30

Re: The general bullshit in arguments over Ripley Mechs

Post by 1138 » 08 Sep 2015, 20:19

Evilkyle24 wrote: Implying that anyone who plays on this server space station 13 is in their right mind.
That's not a justifiable reason to use power loaders in combat whatsoever, sorry.

Actual justifiable reasons: As a last resort against the alien foe, or as a survivor.

Mindlessly charging at aliens is really easy to tell from a glance of the environment.

Gamerofthegame
Registered user
Posts: 105
Joined: 31 Aug 2015, 17:30

Re: The general bullshit in arguments over Ripley Mechs

Post by Gamerofthegame » 09 Sep 2015, 01:28

The problem with that argument is then what becomes a "last resort?" According to dedchat tears it should be against the rules to even look at the Ripley anywhere but the immediate cargo area, let alone the Sulaco as a desperate attempt to repel the boarders as a rag tag team of six dudes.

Personally, so long as it doesn't go planetside without express CO permission and reasoning and it gets a minor speed nerf I couldn't care less. Get good at being robust.

User avatar
Evilkyle24
Registered user
Posts: 539
Joined: 30 May 2015, 21:46

Re: The general bullshit in arguments over Ripley Mechs

Post by Evilkyle24 » 09 Sep 2015, 10:56

1138 wrote: That's not a justifiable reason to use power loaders in combat whatsoever, sorry.

Actual justifiable reasons: As a last resort against the alien foe, or as a survivor.

Mindlessly charging at aliens is really easy to tell from a glance of the environment.
I never said it was. Where did I EVER say that it was in that sentence? How do you see that sentence as a justification for using them in combat? I'm answering UM's question.
Image

User avatar
UnknownMurder
Registered user
Posts: 2243
Joined: 15 Dec 2014, 08:03
Location: Ascension

Re: The general bullshit in arguments over Ripley Mechs

Post by UnknownMurder » 09 Sep 2015, 12:28

He's using your context.
Image

User avatar
1138
Donor
Donor
Posts: 162
Joined: 30 Jun 2015, 03:30

Re: The general bullshit in arguments over Ripley Mechs

Post by 1138 » 09 Sep 2015, 19:40

Gamerofthegame wrote:The problem with that argument is then what becomes a "last resort?" According to dedchat tears it should be against the rules to even look at the Ripley anywhere but the immediate cargo area, let alone the Sulaco as a desperate attempt to repel the boarders as a rag tag team of six dudes.

Personally, so long as it doesn't go planetside without express CO permission and reasoning and it gets a minor speed nerf I couldn't care less. Get good at being robust.
then we will decide that based on testimony from the person operating the ripley and anyone involved.

Remember, if nobody ahelps that it's an issue/unfair, we will automatically assume nobody minded and everyone can continue having fun.

Post Reply