Carrier T3 Evolution: Harbinger (or something else IDK whatever man)

User avatar
Boltersam
Registered user
Posts: 1548
Joined: 22 Feb 2015, 05:43
Location: Tipperary, Ireland
Byond: Boltersam
Steam: Boltersam

Re: Carrier T3 Evolution: Harbinger (or something else IDK whatever man)

Post by Boltersam » 18 Jun 2016, 17:33

Surrealistik wrote:Sorry Azmo, there's just a lot of massive posts in this thread.

The only thing I dislike about not being able to throw the Huggers is that it leaves this caste virtually defenseless and totally worthless by itself (would probably need to have decent melee damage as a result), but if it's buffed in other ways to compensate, I guess that's fine.
If a Crusher is a tank, this is an APC. It's armoured, carries xenos and huggers, but it should be fast to make up for no real solo combat ability, no?

User avatar
Surrealistik
Registered user
Posts: 1870
Joined: 04 Jul 2015, 17:57

Re: Carrier T3 Evolution: Harbinger (or something else IDK whatever man)

Post by Surrealistik » 18 Jun 2016, 17:41

Boltersam wrote: If a Crusher is a tank, this is an APC. It's armoured, carries xenos and huggers, but it should be fast to make up for no real solo combat ability, no?
To compensate for the loss of hugger throwing, its melee damage (even APCs have some nice armaments), armor and speed should probably be buffed in some combination.
Sur 'Druglord' Lahzar; Field Engineer, Perpetually Understaffed and Exasperated CMO/Doctor/Researcher
Bando 'Baldboi' Badderson; PFC, Five foot ten of pure bald glory.

Field Engineer Guide
Medbay Guide
Utility PFC Guide

User avatar
Boltersam
Registered user
Posts: 1548
Joined: 22 Feb 2015, 05:43
Location: Tipperary, Ireland
Byond: Boltersam
Steam: Boltersam

Re: Carrier T3 Evolution: Harbinger (or something else IDK whatever man)

Post by Boltersam » 18 Jun 2016, 17:47

Surrealistik wrote: To compensate for the loss of hugger throwing, its melee damage (even APCs have some nice armaments), armor and speed should probably be buffed in some combination.
I don't think its melee damage should be strong, it would substitute a ravager, and have increased armour and speed. If it's really going to be able to carry so many things, heal other xenos, move fast AND have armour, then I think it's fair to say it shouldn't have many combat options. It's a noncombat transport and healing role. If really needed, it can just unleash all the Xenos it's carrying to defend it.

User avatar
Surrealistik
Registered user
Posts: 1870
Joined: 04 Jul 2015, 17:57

Re: Carrier T3 Evolution: Harbinger (or something else IDK whatever man)

Post by Surrealistik » 18 Jun 2016, 17:59

I'd rather not buff its melee; that's the last thing I want to emphasize about it. An increase in speed and armour might suffice to make it half-decent solo simply via its sheer durability/survivability without encroaching on other castes.

And yes, while it can theoretically unleash its payload, you also have to consider how it does individually; a T3 that's useless by itself is definitely concerning.

Honestly working out the particulars will have to come down to playtesting it in game.
Sur 'Druglord' Lahzar; Field Engineer, Perpetually Understaffed and Exasperated CMO/Doctor/Researcher
Bando 'Baldboi' Badderson; PFC, Five foot ten of pure bald glory.

Field Engineer Guide
Medbay Guide
Utility PFC Guide

User avatar
Boltersam
Registered user
Posts: 1548
Joined: 22 Feb 2015, 05:43
Location: Tipperary, Ireland
Byond: Boltersam
Steam: Boltersam

Re: Carrier T3 Evolution: Harbinger (or something else IDK whatever man)

Post by Boltersam » 19 Jun 2016, 05:40

Surrealistik wrote:I'd rather not buff its melee; that's the last thing I want to emphasize about it. An increase in speed and armour might suffice to make it half-decent solo simply via its sheer durability/survivability without encroaching on other castes.

And yes, while it can theoretically unleash its payload, you also have to consider how it does individually; a T3 that's useless by itself is definitely concerning.

Honestly working out the particulars will have to come down to playtesting it in game.

It would be useless by itself, because it is specifically a -SUPPORT- T3, meant to be helping more combat-focused aliens, that in turn will defend it. It is not meant to be fighting on its own, it's meant to get Aliens to the front lines safely and extract them from dangerous situations. Fast and armoured, but without much combat ability on its own, is perfect for this, and balanced so people don't get the new T3 that is almost as armoured as a crusher with nearly the same damage output as a Ravager as well as being pretty fast and able to heal other aliens. A Hivelord isn't able to fight very well on its own, because it is a SUPPORT T3. Just like this one would be.

User avatar
jalen earl
Registered user
Posts: 184
Joined: 03 May 2016, 19:27

Re: Carrier T3 Evolution: Harbinger (or something else IDK whatever man)

Post by jalen earl » 19 Jun 2016, 07:38

+1 for the idea of a tier 3 in that tree

-1 needs a bit more to make it more enticing to evolve from a carrier, especially with the T3 cap.

Maybe retains weeds but has a reduced speed from carrier in exchange for more health and plasma. also with the load amount more like it as the same huggers count but for T1/2s take up 2 slots so its either 6 huggers or 3 xenos. basically you end up with a tougher but slower carrier that's now strong enough to carry wounded or act as a trojan
Mainly play - SL , SG , SO

A half assed heroic that plagiarizes all his war speeches

User avatar
Surrealistik
Registered user
Posts: 1870
Joined: 04 Jul 2015, 17:57

Re: Carrier T3 Evolution: Harbinger (or something else IDK whatever man)

Post by Surrealistik » 19 Jun 2016, 16:56

Boltersam wrote:It would be useless by itself, because it is specifically a -SUPPORT- T3, meant to be helping more combat-focused aliens, that in turn will defend it. It is not meant to be fighting on its own, it's meant to get Aliens to the front lines safely and extract them from dangerous situations. Fast and armoured, but without much combat ability on its own, is perfect for this, and balanced so people don't get the new T3 that is almost as armoured as a crusher with nearly the same damage output as a Ravager as well as being pretty fast and able to heal other aliens. A Hivelord isn't able to fight very well on its own, because it is a SUPPORT T3. Just like this one would be.
Hivelord is a T2; a Hivelord isn't useless by itself in that it can create hives. A Harbinger is pretty well useless by itself without decent offensive options or the ability to throw facehuggers, being little more than an expensive scout.

Also, I wasn't proposing anywhere near the same damage output as a Ravager.

jalen earl wrote:+1 for the idea of a tier 3 in that tree

-1 needs a bit more to make it more enticing to evolve from a carrier, especially with the T3 cap.

Maybe retains weeds but has a reduced speed from carrier in exchange for more health and plasma. also with the load amount more like it as the same huggers count but for T1/2s take up 2 slots so its either 6 huggers or 3 xenos. basically you end up with a tougher but slower carrier that's now strong enough to carry wounded or act as a trojan
The current version that can throw facehuggers isn't enticing enough?
Sur 'Druglord' Lahzar; Field Engineer, Perpetually Understaffed and Exasperated CMO/Doctor/Researcher
Bando 'Baldboi' Badderson; PFC, Five foot ten of pure bald glory.

Field Engineer Guide
Medbay Guide
Utility PFC Guide

Locked