The problem, Atleast in my opinion, Is that hunters directly outclass tier threes in terms of threat, while also aging faster.Biolock wrote:
Good, and that's how it needs to stay. An average marine should be outclassed by an average young hunter, and then the scale picks up as they upgrade. That's my opinion anyway.
Would you rather face an elite hunter or a mature ravager? Easily the ravager in 100% of cases.
How about Elite hunter or a mature crusher? Yep still the t3
Boiler? t3 Prae? t3 Carrier? Helmet: t3 No helmet: Hunter Hivelord: Hahahahaha
Hell even compared to spitters generally you would prefer facing them over the hunter.
If the hunter doesn't directly pounce on a marine there is essentially no threat to him dying unless a sadar pops out and HE's his friends to stun the hunter briefly. The new meta is to pounce /near/ not on marines and then just slash them. Pouncing on is only used in infection and to 100% guarantee any solo or duo marines die.