Eriks ban appeal.
-
- Registered user
- Posts: 2
- Joined: 12 May 2016, 07:09
Eriks ban appeal.
Your Byond ID: ErikHanson
Duration: Permanent
What other servers do you play on: GoonStation
Are you now or have you been banned on any of them: No.
Ban Reason: https://totallynotmy.website/KXBA.png
Link to previous appeals for the same ban: N/A
Your appeal: I've been banned for a while now, and I'd like to once again play on CM after four months, I've took the time to re-read the rules, and i don't plan on breaking them this time.
Duration: Permanent
What other servers do you play on: GoonStation
Are you now or have you been banned on any of them: No.
Ban Reason: https://totallynotmy.website/KXBA.png
Link to previous appeals for the same ban: N/A
Your appeal: I've been banned for a while now, and I'd like to once again play on CM after four months, I've took the time to re-read the rules, and i don't plan on breaking them this time.
- Westhybrid
- Registered user
- Posts: 374
- Joined: 25 Jul 2015, 03:34
- Location: San Francisco, CA
- Byond: WestHybrid
- Contact:
- Varnock
- Registered user
- Posts: 258
- Joined: 08 Jun 2015, 06:21
Re: Eriks ban appeal.
Alright, bear with me here, as I am about to attempt SCIENCE.
Notes:
Now this doesn't look too good, just off of dates alone. You were warned MANY times, and in my opinion punishment was lenient as all hell. Anyways, this ENTIRE mess happens in the space of less than a month, which does not tell me good things.
In order, by date. Due to how logs work I'll be poking through more than just the specific rounds in question, so be ready for some longer stuff in here.
Jan 11, 2016
Not sure if relevant, but extremely intent on getting into RO for attachments, enough so to try multiple times rather than just deploy.
But he did stand up for a survivor that seemed to have been unjustly killed, which I like.
No other incidents worth mentioning for several rounds after that outside of more getting others to break into and hack the attachment vendor with varying degrees of success.
Some choice selections. I'm not entirely sure how he changed his ID since my reading gives the impression of no command staff whatsoever outside of a griefer CO that was quickly mutinied against. The latter is him preforming MP duties when I believe he was still a Spec? That part isn't very clear.
And here is were they killed themselves with C4 for no discernible reason, citing the latter two as the reasons. This is also where the note in question was made, and it is here I will stop with this particular incident. From what I've seen so far they seem like they weren't a terrible player, often going out of their way to make sure to get people out of the line of fire before shooting, but reading this log is telling. I feel it's enough evidence for now and will investigate further on request.
Almost every single note is based around power or metagaming, and I think those ones speak for themselves considering the span of time they were in and show a general disregard for the rules. The ones that aren't are just little things that I feel should have been obvious not to do. Escalation is also pretty bad in a lot of these it looks like.
A -1 from me, mostly because of the length of time it was done in. They obviously didn't learn anything since they kept breaking rules almost constantly. I mean some of these are on the same day even! Your appeal is also lackluster and gives me no reason to change my mind.
Just let me know if you want me to dig into more of these logs. I think what we have here alone is pretty telling though.
Notes:
Code: Select all
Killed self as specialist due to someone destorying SM and feeling "depressed." When asked if he could have cyroed he said yes, but he wasn't thinking. Seeing how it is his first note, gave him a warning that next time he committed suicide in a job role with a valid reason, it would be a job ban. by () on Mon, January 11th of 2016
Shot someone in briefing as CO, because they called them a asshole. When told he wasn't following escalation rule, he said it was fine since it was just a pistol and not his desert eagle. Next time issue a ban. by () on Wed, January 13th of 2016
Abuseing the one handed fire of a two handed weapon. Warned heavily. by () on Tue, January 19th of 2016
Warned and explained the meta defences rule to them when they built wires aroundthe dropship area before aliens had come up. by () on Sun, January 24th of 2016
Has been informed that the next time he commits meta gaming as the commander he will be job banned from the command staff by () on Sun, January 24th of 2016
Warned for Powergaming Engineering as CO by on Mon, January 25th of 2016
Warned for dissembling shuttle chairs on rasputin as MT for no reason. by on Mon, January 25th of 2016
Banned from Chief Engineer, Maintenance Tech - Once again dissassembled the chairs on the Dropship,Ghosted once Arrested by Adminbot (Friendly Robot) on Tue, January 26th of 2016 Remove
DNA locked the Mech and then Cryoed as the RO with out removing the DNA lock. Issued a warning by on Fri, January 29th of 2016
IC in OOC. Warned. Threatened to "complain on the forums" if note was added. by on Fri, January 29th of 2016
Cyroed himself after the CO gave him orders he didn't like. Also opened fire on a marine who was tresspassing and only called the MPs when I told him to by on Sat, January 30th of 2016
Jumpsuit/ID stripped a marine. Had a strong talk with him about fixing his behavior. Recommending next offense be a perma. by on Sat, January 30th of 2016
Injected marines with a large amount of sopoforic because they said "fuck W-Y". When asked why he was injecting people going down to the planet, he responded "to calm them down and let them settle down." No objectives had been given to the CL during the round. Ban issued due to notes. by on Sun, January 31st of 2016
(Player Report) Caused a one man mutiny on the bridge forcing all command staff to resign, Unjustified mutiny by on Mon, February 8th of 2016
In order, by date. Due to how logs work I'll be poking through more than just the specific rounds in question, so be ready for some longer stuff in here.
Jan 11, 2016
Code: Select all
[06:25:17]ACCESS: Login: ErikHanson/(ErikHanson)
[06:41:47]ADMIN: HELP: ErikHanson/(Clark 'Goofy' Clarkson): Yo, will you guys yell at me if i C4 the RO door so i can grab some attachments? - heard by 1 non-AFK admins.
[06:43:29]SAY: Clark 'Goofy' Clarkson/ErikHanson : MT
[06:43:32]SAY: Clark 'Goofy' Clarkson/ErikHanson : Mind helping me?
[06:43:38]SAY: Wyatt Hoopengarner/Gunso : What with?
[06:43:53]SAY: Clark 'Goofy' Clarkson/ErikHanson : Breaking the RO door open and hacking the vendor so "i" can use it
[06:43:59]SAY: Clark 'Goofy' Clarkson/ErikHanson : I require a charger for the smartgun
Code: Select all
[06:58:21]SAY: Clark 'Goofy' Clarkson/ErikHanson : Great, you murderer
[06:59:57]SAY: Clark 'Goofy' Clarkson/ErikHanson : That doesn't matter
[07:00:02]SAY: Clark 'Goofy' Clarkson/ErikHanson : You could've cuffed the kid
No other incidents worth mentioning for several rounds after that outside of more getting others to break into and hack the attachment vendor with varying degrees of success.
Code: Select all
[10:23:57]SAY: Clark 'Goofy' Clarkson/ErikHanson : Commander is a griefer
[10:24:17]SAY: Clark 'Goofy' Clarkson/ErikHanson : CO IS A GRIEFER, GET HIM. REEEEEEEEEEE
[10:53:40]SAY: Clark 'Goofy' Clarkson/ErikHanson : I'm not the CO
[10:53:47]SAY: Clark 'Goofy' Clarkson/ErikHanson : I just changed my ID so i could loot RO
Code: Select all
[11:06:24]ATTACK: Clark 'Goofy' Clarkson (erikhanson) Used the flash to flash Axel Fouley (intercross21) (<A HREF='?_src_=holder;adminplayerobservecoodjump=1;X=156;Y=65;Z=1'>JMP</a>)
[11:06:26]SAY: Axel Fouley/Intercross21 : Faggot
[11:06:27]SAY: Robert Phillips/Lorenzo_lol : Go
[11:06:27]SAY: Clark 'Goofy' Clarkson/ErikHanson : STOP DOING THAT
[11:06:29]ATTACK: Clark 'Goofy' Clarkson (erikhanson) Used the flash to flash Axel Fouley (intercross21) (<A HREF='?_src_=holder;adminplayerobservecoodjump=1;X=156;Y=65;Z=1'>JMP</a>)
[11:06:31]ATTACK: Clark 'Goofy' Clarkson (erikhanson) Used the flash to flash Axel Fouley (intercross21) (<A HREF='?_src_=holder;adminplayerobservecoodjump=1;X=156;Y=65;Z=1'>JMP</a>)
[11:06:32]ATTACK: Drone (248) (fireice2k8) spat acid on the cultgirder.
[11:06:34]ATTACK: Clark 'Goofy' Clarkson (erikhanson) Used the flash to flash Axel Fouley (intercross21) (<A HREF='?_src_=holder;adminplayerobservecoodjump=1;X=156;Y=65;Z=1'>JMP</a>)
[11:06:36]SAY: Axel Fouley/Intercross21 : I'LL DO WHATEVER I WANT!
[11:06:37]ADMIN: Supermatter Danger! Crystal hyperstructure instability! Instability: 42%
[11:06:38]ATTACK: Clark 'Goofy' Clarkson (erikhanson) Used the flash to flash Axel Fouley (intercross21) (<A HREF='?_src_=holder;adminplayerobservecoodjump=1;X=156;Y=65;Z=1'>JMP</a>)
Code: Select all
[11:13:43]GAME: ErikHanson/(Clark 'Goofy' Clarkson) planted plastic explosives on ErikHanson/(Clark 'Goofy' Clarkson) with 10 second fuse
[11:26:43]SAY: Ghost/ErikHanson : This round is a utter clusterfuck
[11:26:45]SAY: Ghost/ErikHanson : thats why
[11:26:57]SAY: Ghost/ErikHanson : IC justification: depression and aliums
[11:27:09]SAY: Ghost/Gunso : that ain't a good RP reason, you wasted a job slot
[11:27:16]SAY: Ghost/ErikHanson : well, go ban me
[11:27:30]SAY: Ghost/ErikHanson : round is a utter clusterfuck anyway
[11:27:40]SAY: Ghost/ErikHanson : No CO, XO, RO, CT, MT, MP
[11:27:45]SAY: Ghost/ErikHanson : No BO
[11:29:13]ADMIN: PM: Jack McIntyre/(Adam 'Apache' Hunter)->ErikHanson/(Clark 'Goofy' Clarkson): So why did you suicide?
[11:31:06]ADMIN: PM: ErikHanson/(Clark 'Goofy' Clarkson)->Jack McIntyre/(Adam 'Apache' Hunter): The round is/was a utter clusterfuck, a griefing CO, no BO, XO, CT, RO, CE, multiple people griefing, so i took the easy route and just c4'd myself. yeah i'm, fully aware that i was breaking rules there, but the round was fucked anyways
[11:31:21]ADMIN: PM: Jack McIntyre/(Adam 'Apache' Hunter)->ErikHanson/(Clark 'Goofy' Clarkson): You could cyro
[11:31:34]ADMIN: PM: ErikHanson/(Clark 'Goofy' Clarkson)->Jack McIntyre/(Adam 'Apache' Hunter): Yeah, i should have indeed
[11:32:58]ADMIN: PM: Jack McIntyre/(Adam 'Apache' Hunter)->ErikHanson/(Clark 'Goofy' Clarkson): Right usually it would result in a job ban, however since it is your first note, don't do it again. If you do it will result in a job ban.
[11:33:07]ADMIN: PM: ErikHanson/(Clark 'Goofy' Clarkson)->Jack McIntyre/(Adam 'Apache' Hunter): alrighty
Almost every single note is based around power or metagaming, and I think those ones speak for themselves considering the span of time they were in and show a general disregard for the rules. The ones that aren't are just little things that I feel should have been obvious not to do. Escalation is also pretty bad in a lot of these it looks like.
A -1 from me, mostly because of the length of time it was done in. They obviously didn't learn anything since they kept breaking rules almost constantly. I mean some of these are on the same day even! Your appeal is also lackluster and gives me no reason to change my mind.
Just let me know if you want me to dig into more of these logs. I think what we have here alone is pretty telling though.
- Westhybrid
- Registered user
- Posts: 374
- Joined: 25 Jul 2015, 03:34
- Location: San Francisco, CA
- Byond: WestHybrid
- Contact:
Re: Eriks ban appeal.
Yeah, I'm remembering this guy now.
As a few other staff mentioned when your perma was filed, you always seemed to go out of your way to cause trouble, and your notes were very frequent with not much time in-between.
It's a -1 from me. I would, however, recommend you wait another month or two and then appeal. At the moment, I feel it's too early. A half a year seems like a better standing point for you to appeal again and receive probation.
Thanks again, Varnock, for compiling the logs and notes. Forwarding this to the Heads.
As a few other staff mentioned when your perma was filed, you always seemed to go out of your way to cause trouble, and your notes were very frequent with not much time in-between.
It's a -1 from me. I would, however, recommend you wait another month or two and then appeal. At the moment, I feel it's too early. A half a year seems like a better standing point for you to appeal again and receive probation.
Thanks again, Varnock, for compiling the logs and notes. Forwarding this to the Heads.
Goes better with soup.
- TR-BlackDragon
- Registered user
- Posts: 722
- Joined: 30 Jul 2015, 17:24
- Location: Usa eastern
Re: Eriks ban appeal.
Im going to deny this appeal for now for two reasons.
First reason is because you didn't post the proper ban appeal format.
Second is due to the investigators findings.
I recommend trying again in a few months and then make another appeal proper and we can go from there. Locking this in 24 hours.
First reason is because you didn't post the proper ban appeal format.
Second is due to the investigators findings.
I recommend trying again in a few months and then make another appeal proper and we can go from there. Locking this in 24 hours.
-
- Registered user
- Posts: 2
- Joined: 12 May 2016, 07:09
Re: Eriks ban appeal.
I fail to see why removing unnecessary information from the appeal format would be a huge problem, especially when it makes the appeal itself easier to read, and process, why would you need to be reminded of the "Remaining Duration:" on a permanent ban?TR-BlackDragon wrote:First reason is because you didn't post the proper ban appeal format.
How would two months make such a huge difference? I'm fully aware of the rules, and which of them i broke. I've re-read the rules a few times before and after posting this appeal, and I've been playing on numerous other servers outside CM for a good while without receiving bans or amassing a huge amount of notes, which would indicate that I'm not that terrible of a player, probation would easily show this, and re-banning me if I'm still a terrible player in your eyes is easy to do so.Westhybrid wrote:It's a -1 from me. I would, however, recommend you wait another month or two and then appeal. At the moment, I feel it's too early. A half a year seems like a better standing point for you to appeal again and receive probation.
- Westhybrid
- Registered user
- Posts: 374
- Joined: 25 Jul 2015, 03:34
- Location: San Francisco, CA
- Byond: WestHybrid
- Contact:
Re: Eriks ban appeal.
Two factors enter into whether or not your appeal gets accepted. The first is the appeal itself, which, if we're taking your word at face value minus the shit you've pulled, is okay. You sound relatively sincere but your notes are still what we take into account in terms of risk value. You broke a lot of rules in a short amount of time. We don't forget that or treat it lightly.Erik wrote: How would two months make such a huge difference? I'm fully aware of the rules, and which of them i broke. I've re-read the rules a few times before and after posting this appeal, and I've been playing on numerous other servers outside CM for a good while without receiving bans or amassing a huge amount of notes, which would indicate that I'm not that terrible of a player, probation would easily show this, and re-banning me if I'm still a terrible player in your eyes is easy to do so.
The second is that in terms of permanent bans, they're meant to be permanent. It's not a bluff. As annoying as it might be to hear this, giving you a permanent ban does not mean we banned you for four months, it means we banned you permanently. Even probation is a generous offer in some cases, especially yours.
That being said, if we're going to unban someone from a perma, they're better off waiting a long time. It makes us more comfortable in considering your appeal knowing you've actually "served a reasonable amount of time," and it shows that you're willing to be patient in regard to playing on the server again. So to answer the question of "how would two months make such a huge difference," it actually means a lot for both what we can infer about your potential conduct on the server and whether or not we believe you've served an adequate amount of time.
The rules you broke individually are not an incredible feat, but add them all up in that short of time, your perma is absolutely warranted. Waiting half a year feels, at a bare minimum, more right to letting you back than a third of a year.
Some staff might even disagree that you belong back at all. So, my suggestion is just be patient and come back in a month or so. You've started a dialogue, we will remember who you are on your next appeal, and you will have a much stronger chance. Best of luck.
Goes better with soup.
- Feweh
- Donor
- Posts: 4870
- Joined: 24 Feb 2015, 19:34
- Byond: Feweh
Re: Eriks ban appeal.
Really impressed by Varnocks investigation.
As TR said, this is denied.
This is a permanent ban, we have no reason to let you back on the server... especially after your history of notes.
Appeal again in 2 months if you'd like.
24hours till I lock the topic for final thoughts and comments.
As TR said, this is denied.
This is a permanent ban, we have no reason to let you back on the server... especially after your history of notes.
Appeal again in 2 months if you'd like.
24hours till I lock the topic for final thoughts and comments.
- TR-BlackDragon
- Registered user
- Posts: 722
- Joined: 30 Jul 2015, 17:24
- Location: Usa eastern
Re: Eriks ban appeal.
DENIED