Please fix the fucking lights, an engineer story

[Nantei]

Saying that you're loadout is ultimately better than others, or that others fall into powergaming or non-sense is not really a smart way to continue a conversation. (Exception of SMGs, SMGs are bad. If you take a SMG, you're a bad person, very bad. And you should be ashamed of yourself and what you did of your life.)

I'm... fairly certain he was being sarcastic.

[Coat McMutton]

People who pick rail flash as engineer are going to solo rambo queens and should be banned for powergaming when they pick that attachment, tbh.

It appears I need to start marking my facetious posts as such.
Raillights are the least powergamey attachment in the game.

It's too bad you can't drop it when it becomes useless and replace it with a buckshot box.

Adapting to your circumstances is obviously powergaming and forbidden by law. JOKE

Saying that you're loadout is ultimately better than others, or that others fall into powergaming or non-sense is not really a smart way to continue a conversation.

The point here is that in a well-balanced team composition, more engineers would be carrying and using their magic light tool. While I congratulate you on your effectiveness with the all-explodey-man-with-shotguns loadout, I doubt that it would boost marine winrates if all engineers were to utilize it, due to claymores' heavy reliance on the surprise factor and lack of minesweeping crushers.
Hell, if all engineers picked the all-claymore loadout, devs would likely introduce a chance for explosives to blow up when the carrier is shot. MEANT HUMOROUSLY

Pretty sure OP is aware of the existence of preferences in loadouts, too. I personally apologize for using the term "powergaming" in conjunction with the rail flashlight and not obviously marking it as being meant in jest.

Also, *your SHITPOST